...think I found the answer myself: " If you want to use WDS, you can't use WPA or WPA2 encryption. This is because with WPA and WPA2 the MAC addresses of nodes are encrypted. WEP is your only option for any encryption, so go 128-bit." ...I set WPA2 encryption on the network, and the WDS need does not top the fact I don't want WEP encryption so I'll just forget about it
Ehm I didn't mention that Shibby20 working on wndr4500 build, that is in "wip" state http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.ph...client-beta-testing.33858/page-27#post-178911
Well, I answere "luckman 212" ! If you don't like NETGEAR not use them then. It's up to everyone what they are satisfied with.
Hi, I messed something up while playing around too much with the configuration, and would rather just start over again than try to correct it... Would it be safe to just re-flash it with the same .bin? Anything special I need to consider or think about, any precautions etc? Oh, it's an E3000 if that matters. //bloodfaya
You play... you mean internally or just in the GUI?. In both cases performing an erase nvram will be enough unless you cleared some files internally, if this is the case upgrading again with erase nvram ticked will be OK.
Just in the GUI. Awesome, thanks for fast and helpful response Vic! I'll try an erase of the nvram later tonight then Lesson learned: don't let the availability of features create your needs, let your needs decide the features to use
Ps. Where can I erase nvram without re-flashing? Can only see a tick-box option for it to be done automatically after an upgrade?
We would like this to be true - but The Linksys E4200 has in its source code /include/bcmnvram.h Code: NVRAM_SPACE 0xF000 The Asus RT-N16 or N66U have 0x8000 Changing this variable does not change the CFE, and is likely to result in http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/asus-rt-n16-tomato-brick-boot-problem.37025/ For me the RT-N16 is too costly an item to risk!
hello did anybody tried tomato-E3000USB-NVRAM60K-1.28.9011MIPSR2-RAF-NCC-VLAN-VPN-NOCAT.bin and can you tell me how stable it is? right now i'm using tomato-E3000USB-NVRAM60K-1.28.9007MIPSR2_RAF-VPN-NOCAT.bin but i would like to test pptp for a customer and i have a bad experience with many beta releases of dd-wrt, so i am reluctant to try a beta of tomato raf. can someone share his experience on that? thanks.
Hi , Thanks for the tomato Victek moded, I just installed 1.25.8515.2-ND for WHR-G54S, works up to 58Mbps WAN-LAN(the original version is only 18Mbps), I like it very much. Is it possible to install the fastest version "1.28.121006" in WHR-G54S? Should I change the tail "bin" of the firmware file to be "trx" before I flash? Is there any way to block multicast packets so that it does not flood the wireless interface in tomato for kernel v2.4.20?
Hi all; I think this was logged as an issue but wasn't sure if it was Victek's mod. I am unable to get Syslog to work when using "Custom Log File Path". Is anyone else having this issue? Also, some advice if you please, when I turn on QoS, Google Voice really suffers. What is the recommended settings in QoS for this service? Thanks in advance.
Hi Viktek, Any chance you could update the miniupnpd in he build? See this important fix: http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1084
I'll add it to the todo list Update: miniupnpd v1.6 from 05/03/2012 bugfix release was added to the build
Sorry for interrupting, but is there any chance to get Linksys E1000 v2.1 support sometime? If yes, about when? Thanks in advance!
AWESOME! Do you think it would be wise to provide the diff back to miniupnpd author? I'm thinking making it truly a drop-in (including the tomato specific functions) would make life easier...
I think integrating new stuff and porting patches over to Tomato is a thing that we should be dealing with because of better familiarity with the platform from time to time whenever a bug fix/vulnerability/update we'll integrate it.
Sry but im not sure whats the latest version für mein WRT160N is. Im running on " RAF1.28.9006 MIPSR2_RAF K26 Std-NOCAT" and if im right, there is no newer version?
I just found a problem. I replaced one of my E3000s with a E4200, and was not able to get WDS to work with 9011. Before: -E3000(Victek 9011) + E3000(Tomato build 54) = WDS works After: -E3000(Victek 9011) + E4200(Victek 9011) = WDS works for a few minutes, then breaks. Basic>Network; Save will sometimes get it to reconnect, but will break after a few minutes Then I tried... -E3000(Victek 9011) + E4200(Toastman 0497.1) = WDS works, but will break when a 5GHz device(iPad1) connects to the E3000. Basic>Network; Save will sometimes get it to reconnect, but will break again when the iPad reconnects. Then I tried... -E3000(Toastman 7497.1) + E4200(Toastman 0497.1) = WDS works So far the above setup is stable. I've been streaming a movie on the iPad for over an hour and everything has been perfect. I run the WDS on the 2.4GHz band, and each AP has its 5GHz radio on using different channels(149 & 161) using the same SSID
For Victek's latest beta firmware 1.28.9011, which file can be used on a WRT610N version 2.0 router, or is the answer none of them?? And is simultaneous dual-band support enabled with the 9011 beta?
I got the same router that you got yesterday. The WRT610N is a dual-band router, which prolly means that you can use either the RT or RT-N builds. In my case, I went with the kernel 2.6 RT-N builds of Tomato (Toastman or Shibby). I went w/ Toastman.
I recently bought 2 asus rt-n12b1 routers, which want to replace the old rt-n11(no custom firmware can load) and a wl-500gx(lower speed, now with k26 USB 1.28.9054 lite beta), used to link by AP+WDS way of 2 buldings of 10M length, no problem just slower.but... I have tried all Toastman's builds for rt-n12b1, RAF's 079, Shibby's, Oleg's and dd-wrt's builds but all fail to have a stable wireless link at both rt-n12b1 routers, seems not more than 30 minutes, the clint router of rt-n12b1 will become only have tx but no rx flow, set to 20 MHz will last longer than 40 MHz, Shibby's build after setup to be an AP+WDS will brick after reboot, need to be restore firmware, but if I use 1 of rt-n12b1 as a server AP+WDS to link with n-11(hybrid mode) or wl-500gx as clint AP+WDS and they both work fine, except the n12b1 linking each other, any advice?
I have a question, I just got E4200 and flashed it to 9007, wondering if i can flash the Bittorrent client: "Tomato RAF. Bitorrent Client. Last Release. K-2.6.22. MIPSR2" I'm guessing i can't flash it to this because it dosen't specify that it works with the E4200.... but at the bottom of the page it says that E4200 works with all kernel 2.6 editions implying that i CAN flash this firmware on there... So I'm confused, can or or can't i flash the bitorrent client RAF on the E4200?
Make sure the e4200 is a v1 and not a v2. Version 2 is not supported. Linksys made a chip set change which is not supported. --bill
Yes it' s a 1.0, I already flashed it and its working.. but i flashed it to the E4200 specific RAF verison, I want to know if i can flash it to the bitorrent client version or not...
I am getting a similar log message. It looks like victek has a problem. I hope that it can get resolved. Apr 2 16:25:33 unknown daemon.warn dnsmasq[548]: possible DNS-rebind attack detected: victek.is-a-geek.com
Hi Victek; Will build 9012 include the latest commit for VLAN-MultiSSID so as to address the issue "Unable to save virtual wireless" described in this thread http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.ph...n-toastman-7496-2-on-e3000.37091/#post-180415 ?
Hi Victek, Thanks very much for the helpful information. I'm still un-sure how the SSID's should be, the same or each one unique for 2.452 and 5 ghz? As you can see I have them set the same right now, but don't think it matters much since it seems that I'm not utilizing the 5 ghz band at all from what I can tell. Feel free to point out anything that should be changed, since I'm doing this somewhat cluelessly. I also bumped my CPU Freq to 533 MHz ... why? I have no idea. :-p Here's how I have my settings now: Wireless (2.4 GHz / eth1) (Click here to hide) MAC Address .......... Wireless Mode Access Point Wireless Network Mode Auto Interface Status Up (LAN) Radio Enabled SSID Victek Broadcast Disabled Security WPA2 Personal (PSK) + AES Channel 9 - 2.452 GHz Channel Width 40 MHz Interference Level Acceptable Rate 48 Mbps Wireless (eth2) (Click here to hide) MAC Address ........... Wireless Mode Access Point Wireless Network Mode Auto Interface Status Up (LAN) Radio Enabled SSID Victek Broadcast Disabled Security WPA2 Personal (PSK) + AES Channel 149 - 5.745 GHz Channel Width 40 MHz Interference Level Acceptable Rate 450 Mbps
Hi Victek, Your firmware is awesome, thank you! I have a small request which may have been asked before, but I'm not sure. Would it be possible to allow us to change the username for logging in as well? I know DD-WRT can allow this. MANY thanks!
Hi I have a linksys E4200 with version "Tomato Firmware RAF1.28.9007 MIPSR2_RAF K26 USB VPN-NOCAT" and i am trying to wake on wan a compatible nas. I have configured a script in: Administration-->Scripts-->Firewall with this: ip neighbor add 192.168.1.254 lladdr ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff dev br0 nud permanent And i have forwarded port 9 udp to address 192.168.1.254 But when i tried send a magic packet with and android app doesn't works, but the same app works fien in lan. I configured my no-ip address, the nas' mac, and 255.255.255.255 like subnet mask but doesn't works. Can anyone help me?. Thanks
Hi, This is my first try with the Tomato firmware and I'm having a weird problem. I flashed my brand new ASUS RT-N16 with the Victek release (tomato-K26USB-1.28.9006MIPSR2_RAF-VPN-NOCAT.trx) from a PC running windows XP SP3. The problem is that the administration web page takes several minutes to load. The user/password is requested immediately but then it takes very long to load the page. I've tried with different browsers and it is always the same. Also over ethernet and wifi. However, from a different PC with windows 7 the page loads very fast. Telnet access is also strange. From the XP PC the router does not respond. From the W7 PC I get an "unknown login:" prompt but it doesn't accept the correct user and password. I would blame the XP PC for the problem but with this PC I have connected without problems to the router when the ASUS original firmware was still installed and also when I flashed DD-WRT on it as an intermediate step before installing Tomato. Also, I can browse the internet from this PC through the router without problems. I've erased the nvram, made the 30-30-30 reset and re-installed serveral times and the result is always the same. Any help would be appreciated. Vicente
this is via wired/wireless/both? is it possible to create a tcpdump of the network traffic while trying all of this?
The behaviour is exactly the same via wired and wireless. I have made a capture with wireshark. Except for the first connection, which is immediately responded by the router, the PC has to try six times for every subsequent connection, introducing a 93 seconds delay. I'm including here a text summary of the capture for the first connections. The whole capture is too long to include it. Please tell me if you need the information in a different format. As you can see, the first HTTP GET for http://192.168.1.1 is responded very fast with an Unauthorized response. It took me 5 seconds to enter the user/password and then the PC tries six times to establish the TCP connection to send the HTTP GET again with the credentials. The router responds after 93 seconds. After that the browser tries to open three connections to download tomato.css, usbred.css and tomato.js and again it needs six tries and it takes 93 seconds. This pattern repeats for the rest of connections. Thanks a lot for your help Code: No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 1 0.000000 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2047 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 2 0.000393 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 74 80 > 2047 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=5792 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=4294964086 TSecr=0 WS=4 3 0.000410 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2047 > 80 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=14982 TSecr=4294964086 4 0.000526 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 HTTP 772 GET / HTTP/1.1 5 0.000868 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 66 80 > 2047 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=707 Win=7204 Len=0 TSval=4294964086 TSecr=14982 6 0.003182 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 450 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 7 0.003944 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 HTTP 66 HTTP/1.0 401 Unauthorized (text/html) 8 0.003966 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2047 > 80 [ACK] Seq=707 Ack=386 Win=261760 Len=0 TSval=14982 TSecr=4294964086 9 5.563737 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2047 > 80 [FIN, ACK] Seq=707 Ack=386 Win=261760 Len=0 TSval=15038 TSecr=4294964086 10 5.564091 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 66 80 > 2047 [ACK] Seq=386 Ack=708 Win=7204 Len=0 TSval=4294964642 TSecr=15038 11 5.565455 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2050 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 12 8.558496 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2050 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 13 14.493184 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2050 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 14 26.462883 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2050 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 15 50.503046 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2050 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 16 98.482801 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2050 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 17 98.483284 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 74 80 > 2050 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=5792 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=6638 TSecr=0 WS=4 18 98.483352 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2050 > 80 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=15968 TSecr=6638 19 98.483789 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 HTTP 811 GET / HTTP/1.1 20 98.484149 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 66 80 > 2050 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=746 Win=7284 Len=0 TSval=6638 TSecr=15968 21 98.486862 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 1314 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 22 98.486910 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 504 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 23 98.486938 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2050 > 80 [ACK] Seq=746 Ack=1687 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=15968 TSecr=6638 24 98.486976 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 1314 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 25 98.487280 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 1314 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 26 98.487308 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2050 > 80 [ACK] Seq=746 Ack=4183 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=15968 TSecr=6638 27 98.487343 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 743 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 28 98.487750 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 211 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 29 98.487772 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2050 > 80 [ACK] Seq=746 Ack=5005 Win=261320 Len=0 TSval=15968 TSecr=6638 30 98.487806 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 1314 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 31 98.488034 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 1314 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 32 98.488063 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2050 > 80 [ACK] Seq=746 Ack=7501 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=15968 TSecr=6638 33 98.488196 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 1314 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 34 98.488228 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 1314 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 35 98.488261 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2050 > 80 [ACK] Seq=746 Ack=9997 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=15968 TSecr=6638 36 98.488305 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 525 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU] 37 98.488712 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 HTTP 66 HTTP/1.0 200 OK (text/html) 38 98.488746 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2050 > 80 [ACK] Seq=746 Ack=10457 Win=261680 Len=0 TSval=15968 TSecr=6639 39 98.537826 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2050 > 80 [FIN, ACK] Seq=746 Ack=10457 Win=261680 Len=0 TSval=15968 TSecr=6639 40 98.538181 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 66 80 > 2050 [ACK] Seq=10457 Ack=747 Win=7284 Len=0 TSval=6644 TSecr=15968 41 98.554381 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2068 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 42 98.556667 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2069 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 43 98.557409 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2070 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 44 101.500406 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2068 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 45 101.500471 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2069 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 46 101.500503 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2070 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 47 107.535480 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2068 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 48 107.535548 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2069 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 49 107.535637 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2070 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 50 119.506263 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2068 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 51 119.506328 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2069 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 52 119.506418 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2070 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 53 143.545571 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2068 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 54 143.545638 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2069 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 55 143.545729 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2070 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 56 191.526272 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2068 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 57 191.526336 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2069 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 58 191.526431 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 78 2070 > 80 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1260 WS=8 TSval=0 TSecr=0 SACK_PERM=1 59 191.526593 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 74 80 > 2068 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=5792 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=15942 TSecr=0 WS=4 60 191.526644 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2068 > 80 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=16898 TSecr=15942 61 191.526808 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 74 80 > 2069 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=5792 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=15942 TSecr=0 WS=4 62 191.526842 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2069 > 80 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=16898 TSecr=15942 63 191.526896 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 74 80 > 2070 [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=5792 Len=0 MSS=1460 SACK_PERM=1 TSval=15942 TSecr=0 WS=4 64 191.526922 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 TCP 66 2070 > 80 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=262144 Len=0 TSval=16898 TSecr=15942 65 191.527317 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 HTTP 583 GET /tomato.css HTTP/1.1 66 191.527545 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 HTTP 583 GET /usbred.css HTTP/1.1 67 191.527640 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 66 80 > 2068 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=518 Win=6864 Len=0 TSval=15942 TSecr=16898 68 191.527833 192.168.1.45 192.168.1.1 HTTP 582 GET /tomato.js HTTP/1.1 69 191.527840 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 66 80 > 2069 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=518 Win=6864 Len=0 TSval=15942 TSecr=16898 70 191.528217 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.45 TCP 66 80 > 2070 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=517 Win=6864 Len=0 TSval=15942 TSecr=16898
would it be possible to upload the file to some online service or dropbox if you have an account if you don't you should (http://tinyurl/best-dropbox 2gb for free) please create the capture using wired connection and either PM me the link or post here for some more eyes to see unfortunately the summary dump only shows some of the data.
well it looks perfect aside from the timing, try with a different browser I know there is a registry file to restore the way IE handles port 80 authorization I'll have to assume this is related.
Well, the problem is the timing. I can't understand why the router takes so long to accept the connections. I've tried with Firefox, IE and Chrome but the problem is the same. They open the connections in a different sequence but in all cases the router delays the response. Meanwhile I've tried the Toastman release tomato-K26USB-1.28.7497.1MIPSR2-Toastman-RT-VPN-NOCAT.trx and the administration web works flawlessly on the same machine. In my opinion the Victek release has some kind of problem. Thanks for your help.
1.could some one plz inclued quota system for IP/MAC system. 2. IP/Mac Binding with (PC name-Username-Password) Binding. Bcs Mac can be changed. every Client will Enter user name and Password for internet acess.. Thats the way quota works fine. but best thanx..
Hi. I have a linksys E4200 with tomato raf 1.28.9007 Can i backup configuration, upgrade to 1.28.9011 and restore configuration file of 9007 version? Thanks
You need to reconfigure manually (by hand) or use the guideline from this post: http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.ph...orial-and-discussion.28349/page-9#post-138676
I have to say I'm quite happy right now. I was running Tomato RAF 9006 on my Asus RT-N16. I kept having an issue with Windows 7 when I rebooted my computer and logged into my PC. I would have no network connection. I would have to disable/enable the local area connection. I thought it was a problem with me PC. I tried installing several ethernet drivers and nothing fixed it. I got fairly use to doing this after months of doing this. Then I flashed the 9011 beta build and it solved the problem. I no longer have to enable/disable my Local Area Connection when I reboot. I don't know what the problem was with the old firmware. But I am certainly happy the issue has been fixed in the newer firmware.
Hi. Please check my post here firstly. Read my next posts too. Try the solution I've found in this post.
Thanks for the tip sppmaster. I've checked the registry and the Tcp1323 option is indeed activated (value=3) although I've never touched the XP TCP parameters. Now I have the router satisfactorily running a Toastman release. If I've time I'll try the Victek release again and play with this parameter. I will let you know the results. Best regards
Not sure whether Victek is considering to have bandwidth graph for each IP.... Thanks Victek for all the hardwork!
If you install the 9011 Beta you can track each device's bandwidth. See the new feature's. http://www.victek.is-a-geek.com/Repositorios/Beta_RAF/What's new here.txt
Great, thanks. seldom look at the beta section Not sure when Victek is going to release the "final" updates
Hi everyone. New to the forum and new to flashing. I have a Linksys E4200 v1 that I am dying to try some new firmware. I just downloaded victek 9011 beta. Is this a good place to start? is there a guide to install and settings that I can refer? I am really hoping to extract the best possible performance from this router, especially from the 5ghz band Many thanks to anyone who is kind enough to help me I received a E4500 as a gift today. Has there been any talk of custom fw for this router as well?
I don't think any release has been done yet with the E4500. But... the E4200, you should just be able to download the firmware from his website and put it into the firmware upgrade section of the linksys page (been a while since I done it myself so I don't remember how the linksys page looks). As to is it a good place to start? I think that is a matter of opinion. Some prefer Shibby, others prefer Toastman. For now, I prefer this mainly cause I like the feel and I seen that Shibby has a weird issue with PS3 and UPnP or something. As I don't want to deal with that issue since its not my PS3, its about the only thing keeping me from trying Shibby. But Victek is pretty good. I do admit I wish it was updated more often, but I also go with the idea of patience makes software work better. Just be sure that you can handle the 5ghz band. I learned that the hard way when 5ghz band wouldn't work on most of the devices here cause none of them could do 5Ghz.
thanks for the reply. My tv's are 5ghz capable so I plan to steam HDX from Vudu. The rest will be on G on the 2.4ghz band
I may have an UPnP Xbox Live issue with 1.28.9011 on my e3000-RM. My set up is : Linksys cable modem E3000-RM – main router, 2.4ghz And 5ghz N only -hard wire connection to it 2 computers, xbox 360 and 2.4 G AP -wireless connection Phones, laptop and Netgear 5ghz bridge WNHDE111 Netgear 5ghz bridge -hard wire connection Is a LG TV and a 2nd xbox 360 My issue: When I installed 1.28.9007 on my e3000 and I think I didn’t have any xbox live issues meaning my NAT open on my game, but I didn’t stay on 9007 long. When I moved 9011 the box hardwired to the e3000 showed an open NAT but the xbox on the bridge showed a moderate NAT even after NVRAM clear. I moved back to 9007 and still the same issue with the xbox connected to the 5ghz bridge showed a moderate NAT . I made sure that I restarted everything and cleared the NVRAM more than once and insured the UPnP was enabled but still no luck. My temporary solution: I flashed my WRT54GSv4 2.4 G AP to Tomato RAF 1.28.121006 and made it my main router and nothing else. My e3000 is now a 2.4gh G+N and 5ghz N AP and switch only. The xbox connected to the 5ghz bridge now shows a Open NAT and everything still works. If anyone has any Ideas I will look into it otherwise I will be waiting for 9012 to try again.
Hi, i need help!! I have WRT54GS V1 and i update a version of tomato from tomato-K26USB-1.28.9006MIPSR1_RAF-VPN-NOCAT.trx to this release tomato-K26USB-1.28.9011MIPSR2-RAF-NOCAT-NCC-VLAN-VPN-NOCAT.trx ! I forgot to check the checkbox to clear the NVRAM after update ! Update process succesfully but : After the update, i can't reach my router, i try to set manually my ip like said here : http://www.victek.is-a-geek.com/Repositorios/Beta_RAF/Important_Read_1st.txt Anyone know what i can do?
You flashed the wrong version for your router, should be MIPSR1 Version . Your router is bricked. Look in http://www.victek.is-a-geek.com/Repositorios/Tools/ for debrick info.
Hi Victek, I have recently started to use your firmware on my Linksys WRT 54GL. The version of the firmvare is tomato-K26-1.28.9006MIPSR1_RAF-VPN-NOCAT. So far so good everything is funkcioning perfect. However, I am experiencing problems trying to connect remotely throug the WAN port to administrate the router. I have set port 808 for remote administration but could not connect. I have flashed my WRT 54GL router with 2 earlier versions of the software and remote administration was working without any problems. Any recommendations? Keep up the great work!
Really sucks this happened to you. As the other person has said you can only flash a MIPSR1 firmware to your router. I did the same thing once myself. I wasn't paying attention to which firmware I clicked on to flash, and I even knew at that the time not to flash a MIPSR2 firmware to my router. Then my router was nicely bricked. To fix it. I had solder a pin header to the routers motherboard and make a JTAG Cable. I was then able to use some software to reflash the router. I wish I could provide the name of the software I used, but its been quite a few years since I did it. At least this should point you in the right direction, if other methods don't work for you. You should be able to look up some guides.
But question is how much time i put to try to fix it! For a router it cost me 35$! I think i will check for the same model on ebay!
Hmmmm great deal : http://www.ebay.com/itm/Buffered-JT...ltDomain_0&hash=item3f1249605d#ht_4422wt_1396
Did you try hard reset before going down this path? Look here http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Recover_from_a_Bad_Flash
Yep several different reset procedure and the 30/30/30 reset, nothing work. This is my case : The power LED flashes very fast. If it keeps on flashing longer than 2 minutes, without having lit up the other LED's, then a defective bootloader is present. However, if you can ping 192.168.1.1 (your router IP) you can try the TFTP recovery, otherwise you may need to open the router and use the JTAG recovery method below. I can't reach the router, no ping response therefore no TFTP recovery! Last option : JTAG!
If you look on my 4shared site, you'll find lots of debrick tools and stuff all gathered into one place. You might still need to use google for explicit help though. The program you need is JTAG or TJTAG
I've been wondering the same thing. That said, 9011 has been rock solid on my E3000 so I can't complain
Notice that Victek last post was on the 11 of March and then no more posts.... I originally thought he went on holidays but I am starting to think something bigger may have happened. Shibby's builds are fantastic for features but they consume more of the CPU (turn on dnscrypt and look what happens), upnp can hang and consume 100% of the CPU and lacks general stability.
Glad to hear he is fine. Just busy. Of all the Tomato builds I have tried I keep coming back to Victek's. For me and my E4200 they just work and provide me with all the support and performance I need. Currently running 9011 and no issues. I do not do much fancy stuff though. Just support for 5 wireless devices plus one Ethernet attached. ISP is AT&T UVerse. Not wonderful but works for me. --bill
Is there an alternative link? Because when i click to download on his site it says it will take 15 hours...... wtf? Tomato RAF 1.28.9006.. ONLY FOR 4MB Flash (MIPSR2.Kernel 2.6) No USB + Captive Portal + VPN. Updated June 25th.2011. For Asus RT-N10, RT-N12, Linksys E1000 v1, WRT160N v3, WRT310N, WRT320N.
Does any tomato version support Quota system ...Data is already counted but not limited and conditioned on total bandwidth.
Apparently not... http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.ph...1-28-7493-4-5-6-7-8.36106/page-33#post-182862
some for me (with beta11). @Victek - are you planning to test/include the "new" wifi driver (5.100.138.20) as discussed in shibby forum. Can somebody help me to understand the "MultiSSID" settings. I found different statement to config he VLAN settings. Some have VID1 with all ports & VID3 with none. Other disabling port4 in VID1 and set this port for VID3. Both seems to work, but what is the difference/better. On top to mention, that "under QoS Bandwith Limiter" I could not set the IP-range of the "virtual wifi". (192.168.2.x-x) -->Out of IP Range !!!
Is there any possibility of adding dualwan features similar to what these guys have ? www.dualwan.cn ? I'm sure there would be quite a few people who would appreciate this.
ASUS is including the Dualwan code in their latest stock firmware, and since it's open source it might make it easier for the developers here to do this in the near future. Also, it's very unfair for the dualwan.cn folks to take an open sourse code, and add to it and not share whilst profiting off of this themselves. I too anticipate this option, I have two clients I support now with the dualwan.cn firmware and they owuld be willing to pay for a better firmware if available.
