I'm seeing the following error when trying to save IPv6 6rd settings (edit: I'm a noob - see the bottom of this post, or better yet just don't read it at all): This is with tomato-K26USB-1.28.7502.7MIPSR2Toastman-RT-VPN, and I did an NVRAM erase and then applied individual nvram settings from a previous version that specifically did not include anything IPv6-related. Here's what's currently in my nvram: Code: "ipv6_dns=2001:558:feed::1 2001:558:feed::2" "ipv6_6rd_prefix_length=32" "ipv6_tun_v4end=0.0.0.0" "ipv6_accept_ra=3" "ipv6_get_dns=" "ipv6_6rd_borderrelay=68.114.165.1" "ipv6_prefix=2002:4c16:47da:1::" "ipv6_service=native" "ipv6_tun_addrlen=64" "ipv6_ifname=v6to4" "ipv6_prefix_length=64" "ipv6_6rd_prefix=2602:100::" "ipv6_rtr_addr=" "ipv6_tun_mtu=0" "ipv6_portforward=" "ipv6_6rd_ipv4masklen=0" "ipv6_tun_addr=" "ipv6_tun_ttl=255" "ipv6_radvd=1" "ipv6_relay=1" I was trying to play with the settings listed here: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.user-groups.ale/97231 Edit: I'm a noob. Putting "/32" at the end of the 6rd Routed Prefix setting is a no-no.
Please look here,thank you! http://www.linksysinfo.org/index.php?threads/tomato-default-vlan-is-error.68621/
Code: 2013-06-02 192.168.10.100 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.101 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.102 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.104 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.108 1.00 KB 0.00 KB 1.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.109 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.111 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.114 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.137 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.14 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.143 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.158 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.174 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.19 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.198 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.2 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.252 1.00 KB 0.00 KB 1.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.4 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.5 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.50 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.10.8 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.3.11 10,765,162.00 KB 686,799.00 KB 11,451,961.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.3.12 168,736.00 KB 802,398.00 KB 971,134.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.3.17 3,376.00 KB 4,023.00 KB 7,399.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.3.18 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 0.00 KB 2013-06-02 192.168.3.22 8,418.00 KB 526.00 KB 8,944.00 KB Total (26 hosts) 10,945,694.00 KB 1,493,746.00 KB 12,439,440.00 KB 7503.7 or something (latest ver)... and i've reset the data file many times. (stored on CIFS) It's been on for days...... WAN bandwidth is empty... while IPTRAFFIC bandwidth is as above... theres data for just the current day. What's wrong?
Toastman, Could I trouble you to make ver. 502.1 available again. I will download it and save it for future use. Ver. 502.1 has some important fixes to me and I am reluctant to try the beta versions without having ver. 502.1 to go back to. You might recall that ver 502.1 has all of the IPv6 fixes for Comcast and none of the other versions have worked since and the previous versions did not work without WAN Up scripts.. Thank you.
Anyone having trouble installing a cert and maintaining it in nvram after a reboot? I can install the cert just fine and it works when I restart httpd, but then I lose it every time I reboot the router. I've followed the instructions there to install the cert: http://justinho.com/post/2013/01/27...ws-RDP-connections-with-SSL-certificates.aspx
A small question... I have br0 -> vlan1 and br1 -> vlan3. On my vlan1, i have a web server. But when i try to browse websites wich are on vlan1, i have no access. When i ping the website, i get my external ip. So, there is no loopback allowed if vlans are separated ? Is there a solution to keep vlan1 and vlan3 separated, but to allow web browsing (and ftp, and smtp/pop....in fact, every services wich want to connect my router from outside) using loopback ?
The missing OpenSSL bug that I discovered and posted about on April 27/28, 2013 here was fixed in the betas shortly after. However, the bug has returned in Tomato Firmware v1.28.7502 MIPSR2Toastman-RT K26 Mini (Asus RT-N12) Code: root@unknown:/tmp/home/root# openssl openssl: can't load library 'libssl.so.1.0.0' root@unknown:/tmp/home/root# ldd openssl libssl.so.1.0.0 => not found libcrypto.so.1.0.0 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 (0x2aabf000) libdl.so.0 => /lib/libdl.so.0 (0x2abac000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x2abbf000) libc.so.0 => /lib/libc.so.0 (0x2abde000) ld-uClibc.so.0 => /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 (0x2aaa8000) No more local or remote administration via HTTPS
Hello everyone and especially you Toastman, I am receiving an ASUS RT-N66U on Monday, but am unclear which firmware version to flash it with. I am assuming I need a K26, R2 build in the RT-N folder, but it looks like some files do not specify the NVRAM amount. Moreover, it seems like there is some ambiguity about how much NVRAM these routers ship with (http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Asus_RT-N66U, see bottom). I obviously dont' want to brick mine and that post has me quite frightened Can you advise me on which I should flash the router with or tell me how I can find out myself? Thanks!
Have just flashed tomato-K26USB-1.28.7502.8MIPSR2Toastman-RT-VLAN-VPN-NOCAT. IPv6 connectivity via DHCP with PD does not work at all. The router obtains its v6 address, but cannot ping any v6 hosts. There are no router advertisements being sent out from the router to the LAN. This is after erasing the NVRAM. Back to 7501.3 :x
Thanks guys, I appreciate it! I will try the .0502 64k build. After a little more research, I founds some information that I hope helps others with this router. It looks like all versions of this router may have shipped with 64K, but it looks like there may have been a firmware problem that caused the router to report less. My information is gotten from here and here, which in turn was gotten from ASUS direct So excited about this router. My faithful e3000's radios seem to be dying after an overzealous Tx power tweak. Poor little guy... On a separate note to xcysm, whose issue I did not want to overtalk... Yes, I just tried to install a script on tomatousb that pulls files from a secure website, and I too got the openssl error. This is on this build on my e3000: tomato-E3000USB-NVRAM60K-1.28.7502.1MIPSR2Toastman-RT-VLAN-Ext
Congrats on your new RT-N66U! I currently use Toastman's "tomato-K26USB-NVRAM64K-1.28.0502.7MIPSR2Toastman-RT-N-VPN.trx" on my RT-N66U. I don't have any current need for VLAN, but I believe this contains everything except NOCAT for the non-VLAN firmware versions.
June 9 2013 - 1.28.7502.8 and variants manual 6RD gui - fix for typo tomato.c ipv6_6rd_prefix_length, some other small changes cookies expire much less frequently Implement quiet-dhcp, quiet-dhcpv6, quiet-ra options & GUI fix escaping of ` in nvram --set mode Future proof ipt_account.c for newer kernels (thanks rmerlin) include iptables-save & ip6tables-save in router image DHCPv6-PD listen to WAN RA as per RFC 3633. Otherwise no default route set Allow WAN RA to be disabled in DHCPv6-PD case (After talking to a UK ISP it isn't necesarily the case that DHCPv6-PD ISPs will also do RA) update to dnsmasq 2.67cs7 Don't enable IPv6 on eth0, eth1, vlan1 - IPv6 will live on the bridged instances (So 'all' is disabled but default has ipv6 enable so *new* interfaces will get IPv6 - This simplifies the routing table) quiet-dhcp,dhcp6,ra options now use single nvram var dnsmasq_q more cstats fixes - don't treat empty file as failure jffs2: Ensure we do write back the cleared flag - thanks to RMerlin Thanks Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant for the work he is doing, and thanks also to everyone for the feedback! WARNING - DHCP IS DISABLED BY DEFAULT. DON'T FORGET TO TURN IT ON IF YOU NEED IT.
Flashed Tomato-K26USB-NVRAM64K-1.28.0502.8MIPSR2Toastman-RT-N-VPN ... the problem I had with CIFS Client in 1.28.7502.7 is fixed. Everything seems to be running well and no issues to report. Thanks, Pharma
Flashed the "0502.8 Standard" version of Tomato. Should the following "vlan" messages appear in the logs? I have IPv6 disabled. Code: Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.info kernel: br0: port 3(eth2) entering disabled state Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.info kernel: br0: port 2(eth1) entering disabled state Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.info kernel: br0: port 1(vlan1) entering disabled state Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.info kernel: vlan1: dev_set_promiscuity(master, 1) Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.info kernel: vlan1: dev_set_allmulti(master, 1) Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.debug kernel: vlan1: del 01:00:5e:00:00:01 mcast address from vlan interface Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.debug kernel: vlan1: del 01:00:5e:00:00:01 mcast address from master interface Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.debug kernel: vlan1: del 33:33:00:00:00:01 mcast address from vlan interface Jun 9 06:05:58 BBS user.debug kernel: vlan1: del 33:33:00:00:00:01 mcast address from master interface Edit: Aside from the "vlan messages" log question, everything seems to be working fine after 24 hours. Thank you, Pharma
Anyone know if this version is working with Comcast's IPv6 prefix delegation? None of the others since 502.1 have. Edit: Well I just tried it and I am happy to report that this latest version works fine with Comcast's IPv6 prefix delegation. Question: Should I have Accept RA from WAN or LAN or both checked? Currently I have WAN checked but my devices are not receiving a stateful address. Not sure if it is related. Everything is receiving stateless addresses.
Has anyone managed to get 7502.8 working on an Asus RT-N66U? I've tried several, without luck; it just sits there with the power light on, unresponsive to ping. I put it into recovery mode and successfully flashed an earlier version, so it's still alive...but doesn't like .8. I notice there aren't any 64k compiles - might that be why? If anyone's willing to test it on the N66U I'd be grateful. Thanks Will
Works on mine The 64K build is here : http://www.4shared.com/file/8HiQB-wW/tomato-K26USB-NVRAM64K-1280502.html
Have you tried putting it into recovery mode and then erased NVRAM from the recovery website (http://192.168.1.1)? It may boot/reboot a couple times after you erase but that seems to be normal behavior.
Pretty sure I have, yeah. Problem is, I can't get to the recovery page after the .trx is updated. Ho hum. It's beta, after all Toastman, shout if you need me to test anything for you
You have to manually assign an IP address to your NIC (192.168.1.2) to get to the site. I assume you were using the recovery utility to recover the firmware? That will work with a self-assigned address, but the website won't. The recovery website lives in the CFE, it's highly unlikely that any firmware (which the CFE is responsible for loading) will affect it.
I've been flashing from the recovery site in the CFE; there's no recovery utility for OS X. So, IPs are fine. An older 0502 version flashes absolutely fine, but 7502.8 does not (either from Tomato's "upgrade" in the gui, or the CFE site). Have you got 7502.8 working on this router, Monk?
Yes, because you must use RT-N branch for your RT-N66U So 1.28.0502.8 is the 1.28.7502.8 for RT-N66U. If i'm wrong, say me, but these informations come for docs on 4shared
Bagu. So, I'm an idiot. 0502.8 is the same as 7502.8? 4shared is truly horrendously laid out! Thanks for correcting me.
Oh crud, I missed that . Yup, you have to use RT-N builds (0xxx) not RT builds (7xxx) on a RT-N66. The RT-N16 can use both (I guess I thought you were using one), but the N66 can only use RT-N.
Hi Toastman, I am using the original Tomato version on my Linksys WRT160N (previous version of E1000) and I need a Mini version with VPN, however all the version I tried from you are "standard VPN" and it always says the file is too big for the MTD. Is it possible to compile a K2.6 RT "VS" build for next release and put it in the 4shared folder? Great works you did BTW, my Tomato is years old and I would like the latest bug fix and all
First, thank you. The Toastman build is my favorite, and I recommend it to anyone asking about a Tomato firmware. Have you considered using Mega.co.nz as a mirror? You can share a directory, fast transfer speeds, users don't have to register to download, and they have 50GB storage and 1TB monthly transfer on a free account (idk how much bandwidth you use, but my estimate puts that at about 130k downloads a month worth on a free account).
Also wanted to drop a line to express my deep appreciation for all the work you put into 'Toastman' builds of TomatoUSB. I too recommend your builds to friends and out fitted my parents with a your stuff as well (even though they don't know it). On the topic of mirrors, I don't know what the limitations are for size, but github is a very nice place you might consider using as well.
Github discontinued support for downloadable files a few months ago. That's what made me move my own downloads to Mediafire back in December. Costs a few dollars per month for a Pro account, with rollover bandwidth (meaning unused monthly bandwidth gets carried over the next month), and there is no captcha, roadblock or delay for downloaders (who don't need an account either). I'm very happy with it so far.
@malakai - I've been following mega.co.nz's progress for some time. Initially it was almost useless here, but it has improved now. Uploading to it generally works ok now, but there are big issues with browsers other than Chrome (browsers crash, pages load slowly, transfers seems to be deliberately slowed down, login problems) and on many occasions I am unable to log in even using Chrome. Still looking at it.... Latest RT files are there if anyone wants to try it. https://mega.co.nz/#F!GlwCEb4C
At EasyTomato we use Dropbox (starts with 2GB free ) and are pretty happy with it. Couldn't ask for an easier way to upload files... (Don't even need to use a web interface) I think free accounts are capped at 20gb of data a day. Users don't have to make accounts and it's fast. We also looked into Microsoft's Skydrive, which have no limits on data per day and you start with 7gb of space, but haven't switched over yet.
15 Go if you prefer...I try to convert but i still don't know if it's Gb or GB ^^ (with your answer, i think it was GB )
Google Drive comes with 15 GB (big B) of space for free. 100 GB is only $4.99 per month and 200 GB is $9.99 per month.