Tomato 1.25 Victek vs. Tomato NoUSB Std

Discussion in 'Tomato Firmware' started by landa, Aug 16, 2010.


Which firmware is better?

  1. Tomato 1.25 ND Victek

    14 vote(s)
  2. NoUSB Std ND

    9 vote(s)
  1. landa

    landa LI Guru Member

    I have a WRT54GL and I think to upgrade the firmware. Now using Tomato 1.25 Victek and think to go to Tomato NoUSB Std from Do you think is a good idea?
    I lose functionality or performance by doing this?
  2. Azuse

    Azuse LI Guru Member

    Until teddybear gets around to adding mac limiting and gui over-clocking the stability of Victeks mod will win out. The only thing the usb mod adds, that can't be added to victeks (like a gigabit switch of N-access point) is the usb part.

    Still, both things are on the to do list, and it's still only a beta. Given time both functions will appear.

    Edit: Oh and the speed mod also need to be added.
  3. GhaladReam

    GhaladReam Network Guru Member

    Don't forget Victek's RAF mod also has TCP Vegas, which I don't believe teddybear's USBmod has.
  4. rhester72

    rhester72 Network Guru Member

    TB has Vegas, but it is only of value for WAN-based applications you are running on the router itself (it is utterly useless for anything requiring port forwarding or running on a different host).

  5. ecnav

    ecnav Networkin' Nut Member

  6. karogyoker

    karogyoker Addicted to LI Member

    Make sure you don't use pfifo Qdisc sheduler at he QoS options becouse it not works correctly!
  7. zorkmta

    zorkmta Network Guru Member

    Vicktec version work charming
  8. Toastman

    Toastman Super Moderator Staff Member Member

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice