VPN IPSec RV042-Pix

Discussion in 'Networking Issues' started by ssilogan, Sep 19, 2008.

  1. ssilogan

    ssilogan Guest

    Hello,
    I am trying to close an IPSec tunnel between 2 of our offices. My office has a Linksys RV042 and the other point a Cisco Pix. I have tried changing between md5 and sha and des and 3des and the preshare key. I am getting the following logfile:
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log Initiating Main Mode
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 2nd packet
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Main Mode 3rd packet
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID payload Type = [XAUTH]
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log Received Vendor ID payload Type = [Dead Peer Detection]
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID payload Type = [Cisco-Unity]
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log Ignoring Vendor ID payload [65c05aa33d47c598...]
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] <<< Initiator Received Main Mode 4th packet
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 5th packet
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '200.158.120.119'
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Main Mode Phase 1 SA Established
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Initiator Cookies = af46 e18d 624 cc29
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Responder Cookies = 907 fdbe 3d46 c598
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log initiating Quick Mode PSK+TUNNEL
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator send Quick Mode 1st packet
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log Received informational payload, type IPSEC_INITIAL_CONTACT
    Sep 19 10:36:51 2008 VPN Log Received informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN

    I can't seem to find any information on the last comment. Everything on both sides is the same, with several combinations at that. I have liberated ''any'' traffic between the 2 public IPs in the access rules section.

    Any input would be greatly appreciated

    Logan
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice