1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What? There is no discussion about the RVL200

Discussion in 'Cisco Small Business Routers and VPN Solutions' started by StonerMeister, Jul 31, 2006.

  1. StonerMeister

    StonerMeister LI Guru Member

    Greetings,

    I thought the board would be full of info about the RVL200...but there nada...zip zero...nothing.

    Bummer...
     
  2. Toxic

    Toxic Administrator Staff Member

    it is a new product, and most likely not that many have this unit yet. when 1000's buy it you might find a thread or too.
     
  3. subtitle

    subtitle LI Guru Member

    Picked up a new RVL200 and the SSL VPN and QOS work well so far. But there appears to be a rather annoying bug in v1.0.13...the IPSec passthrough doesn't seem to work. We've tried it both behind an RV042 and directly connected to the public network. Both the Cisco and Nortel VPN clients connect but don't pass traffic. I have an open case with linksys support so hopefully this situation will be corrected.

    Also it appears the SSL VPN is capped at 64K each for 5 connections which might be due to the RVL200's CPU... just a guess. If so, it might be nice to maybe allow two connections at 160K.
     
  4. jmcgee_jr

    jmcgee_jr Network Guru Member

    I found a huge bug the damn thing responds to all ARP requests outside its native network LOL.
     
  5. Toxic

    Toxic Administrator Staff Member

    could you be a bit more specific? exact replication is always a good source as users can then confirm the findings, i can then report this to the powers that be at linksys.

    PS, moved to correct forum.
     
  6. Toxic

    Toxic Administrator Staff Member

    My initial findings of this new router are quite good however i have seen a few things I am missing.

    lack of IPSec VPN tunnels (only 1 IPSec Tunnel so far)
    No Static DHCP service
    NO QuickVPN support
     
  7. subtitle

    subtitle LI Guru Member

    I apoligize, but what "correct forum" was this moved to?
     

Share This Page